Background:

Irrigation is commonly used as an adjuvant treatment during the intralesional curettage of bone tumors. The goal of the present study was to analyze the in vitro cytotoxicity of commonly used irrigation solutions on chondrosarcoma and giant cell tumor (GCT) cells as there is no consensus on which solution leads to the greatest amount of cell death.

Methods:

An in vitro evaluation was performed by exposing human GCT and human chondrosarcoma cell lines to 0.9% saline solution, sterile water, 70% ethanol, 3% hydrogen peroxide, 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), and 0.3% povidone iodine solutions independently for 2 and 5 minutes. A low-cytotoxicity control (LCC) and a high-cytotoxicity control (HCC) were established to determine the mean cytotoxicity of each solution and each solution’s superiority to LCC and non-inferiority to HCC.

Results:

The present study demonstrated that 0.05% CHG was non-inferior to the HCC when chondrosarcoma was exposed for 5 minutes and when GCT was exposed for 2 and 5 minutes (mean cytotoxicity, 99% to 102%) (p < 0.003 for all). Sterile water was superior to the LCC when chondrosarcoma was exposed for 5 minutes and when GCT was exposed for 2 minutes (mean, 28% to 37%) (p < 0.05). Sterile water (mean, 18% to 38%) (p < 0.012) and 3% hydrogen peroxide (mean, 7% to 16%) (p < 0.001) were both inferior to the HCC. The 3 other solutions were non-superior to the LCC (mean, -24% to -5%) (p < 0.023).

Conclusions:

In vitro irrigation in 0.05% CHG provided high cytotoxicity, comparable with the HCC. Therefore, the use of a 0.05% CHG solution clinically could serve as a potential chemical adjuvant during intralesional curettage of chondrosarcoma and GCT.

Clinical relevance:

In an effort to reduce the burden of residual tumor cells, irrigation solutions are often utilized as adjuvant local therapy. Use of a 0.05% CHG solution clinically could serve as a potential chemical adjuvant to intralesional curettage of chondrosarcoma and GCT. Further in vivo studies may be indicated to assess clinical outcomes and safety associated with the use of 0.05% CHG in the treatment of chondrosarcoma and GCT.

Background:

Irrigation is commonly used as an adjuvant treatment during the intralesional curettage of bone tumors. The goal of the present study was to analyze the in vitro cytotoxicity of commonly used irrigation solutions on chondrosarcoma and giant cell tumor (GCT) cells as there is no consensus on which solution leads to the greatest amount of cell death.

Methods:

An in vitro evaluation was performed by exposing human GCT and human chondrosarcoma cell lines to 0.9% saline solution, sterile water, 70% ethanol, 3% hydrogen peroxide, 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), and 0.3% povidone iodine solutions independently for 2 and 5 minutes. A low-cytotoxicity control (LCC) and a high-cytotoxicity control (HCC) were established to determine the mean cytotoxicity of each solution and each solution’s superiority to LCC and non-inferiority to HCC.

Results:

The present study demonstrated that 0.05% CHG was non-inferior to the HCC when chondrosarcoma was exposed for 5 minutes and when GCT was exposed for 2 and 5 minutes (mean cytotoxicity, 99% to 102%) (p < 0.003 for all). Sterile water was superior to the LCC when chondrosarcoma was exposed for 5 minutes and when GCT was exposed for 2 minutes (mean, 28% to 37%) (p < 0.05). Sterile water (mean, 18% to 38%) (p < 0.012) and 3% hydrogen peroxide (mean, 7% to 16%) (p < 0.001) were both inferior to the HCC. The 3 other solutions were non-superior to the LCC (mean, -24% to -5%) (p < 0.023).

Conclusions:

In vitro irrigation in 0.05% CHG provided high cytotoxicity, comparable with the HCC. Therefore, the use of a 0.05% CHG solution clinically could serve as a potential chemical adjuvant during intralesional curettage of chondrosarcoma and GCT.

Clinical relevance:

In an effort to reduce the burden of residual tumor cells, irrigation solutions are often utilized as adjuvant local therapy. Use of a 0.05% CHG solution clinically could serve as a potential chemical adjuvant to intralesional curettage of chondrosarcoma and GCT. Further in vivo studies may be indicated to assess clinical outcomes and safety associated with the use of 0.05% CHG in the treatment of chondrosarcoma and GCT.

Background:

Irrigation is commonly used as an adjuvant treatment during the intralesional curettage of bone tumors. The goal of the present study was to analyze the in vitro cytotoxicity of commonly used irrigation solutions on chondrosarcoma and giant cell tumor (GCT) cells as there is no consensus on which solution leads to the greatest amount of cell death.

Methods:

An in vitro evaluation was performed by exposing human GCT and human chondrosarcoma cell lines to 0.9% saline solution, sterile water, 70% ethanol, 3% hydrogen peroxide, 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), and 0.3% povidone iodine solutions independently for 2 and 5 minutes. A low-cytotoxicity control (LCC) and a high-cytotoxicity control (HCC) were established to determine the mean cytotoxicity of each solution and each solution’s superiority to LCC and non-inferiority to HCC.

Results:

The present study demonstrated that 0.05% CHG was non-inferior to the HCC when chondrosarcoma was exposed for 5 minutes and when GCT was exposed for 2 and 5 minutes (mean cytotoxicity, 99% to 102%) (p < 0.003 for all). Sterile water was superior to the LCC when chondrosarcoma was exposed for 5 minutes and when GCT was exposed for 2 minutes (mean, 28% to 37%) (p < 0.05). Sterile water (mean, 18% to 38%) (p < 0.012) and 3% hydrogen peroxide (mean, 7% to 16%) (p < 0.001) were both inferior to the HCC. The 3 other solutions were non-superior to the LCC (mean, -24% to -5%) (p < 0.023).

Conclusions:

In vitro irrigation in 0.05% CHG provided high cytotoxicity, comparable with the HCC. Therefore, the use of a 0.05% CHG solution clinically could serve as a potential chemical adjuvant during intralesional curettage of chondrosarcoma and GCT.

Clinical relevance:

In an effort to reduce the burden of residual tumor cells, irrigation solutions are often utilized as adjuvant local therapy. Use of a 0.05% CHG solution clinically could serve as a potential chemical adjuvant to intralesional curettage of chondrosarcoma and GCT. Further in vivo studies may be indicated to assess clinical outcomes and safety associated with the use of 0.05% CHG in the treatment of chondrosarcoma and GCT.

Background:

Irrigation is commonly used as an adjuvant treatment during the intralesional curettage of bone tumors. The goal of the present study was to analyze the in vitro cytotoxicity of commonly used irrigation solutions on chondrosarcoma and giant cell tumor (GCT) cells as there is no consensus on which solution leads to the greatest amount of cell death.

Methods:

An in vitro evaluation was performed by exposing human GCT and human chondrosarcoma cell lines to 0.9% saline solution, sterile water, 70% ethanol, 3% hydrogen peroxide, 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), and 0.3% povidone iodine solutions independently for 2 and 5 minutes. A low-cytotoxicity control (LCC) and a high-cytotoxicity control (HCC) were established to determine the mean cytotoxicity of each solution and each solution’s superiority to LCC and non-inferiority to HCC.

Results:

The present study demonstrated that 0.05% CHG was non-inferior to the HCC when chondrosarcoma was exposed for 5 minutes and when GCT was exposed for 2 and 5 minutes (mean cytotoxicity, 99% to 102%) (p < 0.003 for all). Sterile water was superior to the LCC when chondrosarcoma was exposed for 5 minutes and when GCT was exposed for 2 minutes (mean, 28% to 37%) (p < 0.05). Sterile water (mean, 18% to 38%) (p < 0.012) and 3% hydrogen peroxide (mean, 7% to 16%) (p < 0.001) were both inferior to the HCC. The 3 other solutions were non-superior to the LCC (mean, -24% to -5%) (p < 0.023).

Conclusions:

In vitro irrigation in 0.05% CHG provided high cytotoxicity, comparable with the HCC. Therefore, the use of a 0.05% CHG solution clinically could serve as a potential chemical adjuvant during intralesional curettage of chondrosarcoma and GCT.

Clinical relevance:

In an effort to reduce the burden of residual tumor cells, irrigation solutions are often utilized as adjuvant local therapy. Use of a 0.05% CHG solution clinically could serve as a potential chemical adjuvant to intralesional curettage of chondrosarcoma and GCT. Further in vivo studies may be indicated to assess clinical outcomes and safety associated with the use of 0.05% CHG in the treatment of chondrosarcoma and GCT.

Background:

Irrigation is commonly used as an adjuvant treatment during the intralesional curettage of bone tumors. The goal of the present study was to analyze the in vitro cytotoxicity of commonly used irrigation solutions on chondrosarcoma and giant cell tumor (GCT) cells as there is no consensus on which solution leads to the greatest amount of cell death.

Methods:

An in vitro evaluation was performed by exposing human GCT and human chondrosarcoma cell lines to 0.9% saline solution, sterile water, 70% ethanol, 3% hydrogen peroxide, 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), and 0.3% povidone iodine solutions independently for 2 and 5 minutes. A low-cytotoxicity control (LCC) and a high-cytotoxicity control (HCC) were established to determine the mean cytotoxicity of each solution and each solution’s superiority to LCC and non-inferiority to HCC.

Results:

The present study demonstrated that 0.05% CHG was non-inferior to the HCC when chondrosarcoma was exposed for 5 minutes and when GCT was exposed for 2 and 5 minutes (mean cytotoxicity, 99% to 102%) (p < 0.003 for all). Sterile water was superior to the LCC when chondrosarcoma was exposed for 5 minutes and when GCT was exposed for 2 minutes (mean, 28% to 37%) (p < 0.05). Sterile water (mean, 18% to 38%) (p < 0.012) and 3% hydrogen peroxide (mean, 7% to 16%) (p < 0.001) were both inferior to the HCC. The 3 other solutions were non-superior to the LCC (mean, -24% to -5%) (p < 0.023).

Conclusions:

In vitro irrigation in 0.05% CHG provided high cytotoxicity, comparable with the HCC. Therefore, the use of a 0.05% CHG solution clinically could serve as a potential chemical adjuvant during intralesional curettage of chondrosarcoma and GCT.

Clinical relevance:

In an effort to reduce the burden of residual tumor cells, irrigation solutions are often utilized as adjuvant local therapy. Use of a 0.05% CHG solution clinically could serve as a potential chemical adjuvant to intralesional curettage of chondrosarcoma and GCT. Further in vivo studies may be indicated to assess clinical outcomes and safety associated with the use of 0.05% CHG in the treatment of chondrosarcoma and GCT.